Structural Bridge Model
A team of civil and mechanical engineering students set out to design, build, and test a scaled model of a structural bridge using the FabLab’s digital fabrication tools — 3D printing and laser cutting. The project’s goal was to analyze how forces are distributed across a bridge structure, understand material efficiency, and test failure behavior under increasing load conditions.
Through this hands-on project, the students experienced a complete engineering workflow — from computer-aided design and simulation to real-world experimentation and optimization. The final prototype became a teaching model used by future classes to demonstrate structural behavior and the impact of design decisions.
Difficulty level :
Medium
Working time :
5 days
Supplies
- 3D Printer: Prusa i3 MK3S+
- Laser Cutter: Trotec Speedy 300
- Software: Fusion 360 (design + simulation), PrusaSlicer, LightBurn
- Materials: PLA filament (1.75 mm), 3 mm acrylic sheets
Step 1 : Research & Concept Phase
Step 2 : 3D Design and Modeling
- The structure was modeled in Fusion 360 using parametric constraints, allowing instant adjustment of dimensions.
- Each element (top chord, diagonals, cross beams, joints) was designed as an independent component.
- The design was assembled digitally to verify alignment and ensure ease of physical assembly later.
- Structural nodes and connections were optimized for interlocking fit and reduced adhesive use.
Step 3 : Simulation and Optimization
Step 4 : Fabrication
- The students divided fabrication by method:
Laser-cut acrylic beams for precision and speed. 3D-printed connectors and joints for customized geometry. - Files were sliced in (for 3D printing) and (for laser cutting).
- Printing parameters:
Material: PLA (1.75 mm) Layer height: 0.2 mm Infill: 60% gyroid pattern Print time: 5 hours total - Laser cutting used 3 mm acrylic sheets for the main beams, cut in under 20 minutes.
Step 5 : Assembly
- The printed joints and acrylic beams were assembled on a flat jig to maintain alignment.
- Connections were secured using press-fit design and screws — no glue required.
- Once complete, the bridge was inspected with a digital caliper to check tolerances (< 0.5 mm deviation).
- Aesthetic details such as color-coded members (compression vs tension) were added for educational use.
Step 6 : Load Testing
- The prototype was mounted on a mechanical testing bench with force and displacement sensors.
- Incremental weights were added every 500 g until the structure began to deform.
- Data points (force vs deflection) were recorded digitally, creating a load–displacement curve.
- Failure occurred at the mid-span joint under a maximum load of 10.5 kg — closely matching simulation predictions.
- High-speed camera footage captured real-time deformation, providing valuable visual analysis.